I’m happy to say that since writing that first column, living cable-TV-free has only gotten easier. Those who ditch the bloated cable bundle now have more choices and better programming than they did a year ago, as TV networks and service providers realize they must start appealing to this rapidly-growing audience.
Let’s look back at some of the highlights:
HBO, Showtime, and CBS all launched standalone streaming (aka over-the-top) versions of their channels, with no need for a bundled pay-TV subscription.
Dish launched Sling TV, a $20-per-month streaming service aimed directly at cord cutters with 20 live cable channels, including ESPN, CNN, and The Food Network.
As expected, these developments produced plenty of hand-wringing from the cable-TV defense force. Industry pundits have argued that you’re better off overpaying for lots of channels, ignoring how many people are perfectly happy with a few solid streaming services.
Perhaps realizing that the money argument isn’t holding water, cable apologists have also warned that great television won’t exist without expensive bundles. Nevermind that Netflix, Amazon Prime, and HBO are pumping out plenty of great original content from outside the basic cable package, while the typical cable channel is filled with reruns and reality drivel.
Even the lowly over-the-air antenna is back in the spotlight, as more people realize they can get broadcast channels in high-definition for free. Seizing the opportunity, Microsoft released a U.S. TV Tuner for the Xbox One, letting cord cutters tap into the console’s TV program guide and stream live video to other devices around the house. DVR support is coming next year.
While this has been a pivotal year for cord cutting, there’s plenty more to look forward to.
We’ve still yet to see any traditional cable channels go it alone with an a la carte streaming service. Some have joined on with Sling TV, while others put their current programming on Hulu or offer a limited number of shows online for free, but the vast majority of TV networks are still clinging to the cable bundle for dear life. I expect that’ll start to change in the year ahead.
As for smaller bundles, the options for cord cutters remain slim. Comcast’s streaming service is still limited to a few markets, and Time Warner hasn’t technically announced anything. A long-rumored service from Apple is unlikely to materialize until at least next year, and Sony’s PlayStation Vue bundle is available in just seven U.S. cities. Again, it’s likely that competition between smaller bundles will grow in 2016 and beyond.
On the streaming-device front, there’s still lots of work to be done in content discovery, so that users don’t have to dig through two-dozen apps to find what they want. Universal search is a start, but ultimately we need better recommendations from across all the major streaming apps. Device makers such as Apple, Google, and Amazon also need to start getting along, so the services you can access aren’t limited by the hardware you choose.
In any case, I predict the next year will be even better for cord cutting than the last. Any arguments to the contrary by the cable defense force will have to become increasingly convoluted.
Jared Newman has been helping folks make sense of technology for over a decade, writing for PCWorld, TechHive, and elsewhere. He also publishes two newsletters, Advisorator for straightforward tech advice and Cord Cutter Weekly for saving money on TV service.