On the surface, Apple TV seems increasingly focused on cable subscribers instead of cord cutters.
Since its launch last fall, the fourth-generation Apple TV has added several features that provide more convenient access to “TV Everywhere” apps (such as WatchESPN, FX Now, and HBO Go) that require a cable or satellite login to access. Siri is becoming more effective at finding what you want from these channels; the download process is becoming more streamlined; and with the next version of Apple’s tvOS software, logging into these apps will become much less of a hassle.
While these are useful improvements, it’s hard to believe cable subservience is Apple’s true goal. For a device that’s supposedly the “future of television,” its best features are becoming awfully dependent on a cable subscription, which in turn requires a cable box. Can Apple really reinvent TV when its hardware is relegated to a secondary input or a spare television?
With tvOS, I believe Apple is laying the groundwork for something bigger. Either Apple is preparing for a future where more cable companies offer streaming-only TV service—sans cable box—or it’s hoping to offer its own standalone streaming service that provides access to a bundle of TV Everywhere apps.
Re-imagining an Apple streaming service
Rumors of an Apple streaming-TV service have persisted for years, often with the assumption that Apple would reinvent the TV interface along with it. While Apple has reportedly pressed pause on developing its own service, the interface reinvention is happening anyway through the existing cable app ecosystem.
TV Everywhere apps are available on lots of other streaming boxes, from Roku to Amazon Fire TV, but Apple is trying to make them easier to use. A section of the App Store provides quick access to all of these apps in one place, and with single sign-in coming to the next version of tvOS, you’ll only have to enter login credentials once to access every app. (To go a step further, imagine if services were tied to your AppleID, so you’d never have to login after initially setting up the Apple TV.)
Apple still has work to do in re-imagining the TV interface. Streaming devices like Apple TV could use some kind of universal watch list, and more ways to browse for recent or favorite programs that don’t involve yelling at your remote control or jumping into a dozen different apps. (My hope is that Apple creates a TV-centric version of the “Proactive” features that exist on iPhone and iPad.)
Still, tvOS already goes a long way toward rethinking how we navigate traditional TV channels. If Apple is able to secure streaming rights to these channels, it won’t need to reinvent the wheel.
The real future of TV
None of this is to suggest that an Apple streaming service is imminent. Last we heard, Apple had gotten frustrated with the deal-making process, especially for local broadcasts that require agreements with individual affiliate stations.
I’ll also acknowledge that a bundle focused on TV Everywhere apps might not be a complete solution for everyone. Today, the apps from major broadcast networks (such as ABC and Fox) don’t offer live local feeds, which means no local news and no football on Sundays. Some networks don’t offer TV Everywhere apps at all.
In this scenario, you might use the full-blown Comcast or Charter app to access certain channels or shows. But over time, the Apple TV’s app-based approach would take over, thanks to powerful features like Siri search that make navigation easier. The number of TV Everywhere apps would grow, and eventually you’d no longer miss the cable guide or the clunky remote controls of your youth. Instead of playing second fiddle to the cable box, Apple TV would become the main attraction.
Jared Newman has been helping folks make sense of technology for over a decade, writing for PCWorld, TechHive, and elsewhere. He also publishes two newsletters, Advisorator for straightforward tech advice and Cord Cutter Weekly for saving money on TV service.