Screencasting programs are most often used to explain how to use a computer program or a Website, but they can also be used for other purposes. A few years ago, The New York Times published an article describing how the digital divide -- the divide between those who have access to technology and those who don't -- was no longer a major concern. I work in a public library, and that article was some of the best fiction I'd read in a long time. Almost nothing in the article was true, and I needed a way to tell this to the author of the article, as well as the rest of the Internet.
So I fired up Camtasia Studio, an excellent screencasting program, and reached for my guitar. With the help of a public-domain melody -- an old folk song titled, “Whiskey in the Jar” -- I created a short multimedia piece that explained my reaction to this article. I used a screengrab from the article itself as the background of the piece.
I uploaded the presentation to the Internet Archive, which provides free Web hosting for media files. And then I went looking for the e-mail address of the author of the article. His e-mail address was nowhere to be found. The author of an article about the digital divide was not reachable by e-mail. Imagine the irony of that. So I sent a link to the piece to a tech reporter at The New York Times and asked that reporter (based in San Francisco) to forward the link to the author of the article.
Interested in seeing that presentation? Here it is.
I changed the title of the song from “Whiskey in a Jar” to “Whiskey in Your Jar.” You can think about why I did that.
In the age of Twitter, the link to this screencast can rapidly bounce around the Internet. It's entirely possible to talk back to the New York Times – and in a way far more powerful and more authentic than a polite letter to the editor. And sometimes it's for the newspapers' own benefit that people talk back to them.
When I was not able to reach the author of that article about the digital divide, some friends and I made this spoof YouTube video to share some thoughts about how clueless newspapers are in the new age. This video is a panel discussion where I serve as the panel moderator and as all four panelguests, in the style of a Saturday Night Live skit. Back in 2007, this video was chosen as a YouTube Editor's Choice.
Cheeky? Yes. Truthful? Probably so. Someone I know who works at the New York Times told me I was not far off the mark with this video.
The blogger is an educator and community builder in the Washington DC-area. He can be reached at philshapiroblogger@gmail.com and on Twitter at http://www.twitter.com/philshapiro
Previous blog posts:
Why I'd Choose St. Louis for Google's Gigabit Fiber Project
Public Libraries as Business Incubators
It's Time for Public Libraries to Get Creative
A Profile of Brennon T. Williams, Techie Entrepreneur
A Review of Verizon's One-on-One Droid Training
Tetravex Logic Puzzles on Martin Luther King Day
Designed by Consumers - Screenless Laptops
Book Review - Scratch 1.4 - A Beginner's Guide
How to Thank a Teacher in the Digital Age
Twitter Does Not Need to be Free
Google SketchUp Delights the Mind
Crowdsourcing the MacArthur Awards
Should the Gates Foundation Support Linux and Apple Computers in Public Libraires?
Whimsy and Fun Overflow in YouTube Music Video
Video Book Reviews on Amazon.com
Pets Speak Their Mind on YouTube
Cooked Rice Vocabulary Project
Moodle Used by Cub Scout Pack in Ohio
Scratch Day 2009 - Computer Programming for Kids
Exit Newsweek - Enter MAKE Magazine
SketchUp Projects for Kids - Book Review
Where Are the Centenarians in Apple Commercials?
YouTube is a Thousand Times More Interesting than Television
The Apple II Gains Eternal Life in the Web Browser
Should Public Libraries Be Welcoming Homes for Ingenuity?
An Easy Way to Introduce Inkscape Drawing Program to Youth and Adults
This story, "Talking Back to the New York Times" was originally published by PCWorld.